Mortgage Lending by State

Nationwide coverage: all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories (Puerto Rico, Guam, U.S. Virgin Islands), 54 jurisdictions in total, where HMDA-reporting lenders originated mortgages in 2024.

Coverage note: counts above 50 reflect U.S. states + DC + territories combined, not a claim of 50+ U.S. states. HMDA jurisdictional scope is defined by the U.S. Census Bureau FIPS coding system, which assigns codes to states, DC, and outlying territories alike.

State-level HMDA data aggregates all mortgage applications, originations, and denial rates reported by lenders operating within each jurisdiction during 2024. Sorted by application volume, jurisdictions with the most mortgage activity appear first. Click any state for demographics, top lenders, and county breakdowns.

State Applications Originated Denial Rate Avg Loan Lenders
Texas 1,069,032 491,716 17.2% $314,820 1,366
Florida 1,045,456 474,589 19.8% $326,258 1,816
California 1,023,783 509,170 17.6% $507,281 990
North Carolina 493,843 256,370 17.3% $282,197 1,113
Georgia 478,124 227,610 18.5% $359,934 1,053
Ohio 460,906 246,113 17.3% $203,792 970
Pennsylvania 446,527 245,926 18.4% $214,851 1,019
Illinois 394,104 203,770 16.5% $268,167 1,026
New York 383,577 208,787 19.4% $458,435 623
Michigan 370,616 203,987 18.5% $194,086 859
Virginia 351,003 182,923 15.5% $334,689 889
Arizona 324,293 167,105 15.6% $327,071 975
New Jersey 323,471 156,392 18.1% $369,966 770
Tennessee 310,047 159,911 16.1% $281,070 1,142
Indiana 292,796 162,462 15.9% $205,459 898
Washington 277,210 153,279 15.7% $423,489 729
Colorado 267,434 143,013 15.7% $393,172 957
South Carolina 258,079 127,052 17.5% $273,782 998
Missouri 242,582 130,974 14.0% $219,793 885
Maryland 235,444 116,805 17.3% $327,030 734
Massachusetts 214,900 119,508 16.6% $411,786 673
Wisconsin 213,989 137,301 13.9% $214,536 840
Alabama 211,330 104,225 18.9% $210,917 864
Minnesota 187,575 112,435 12.7% $256,619 779
Kentucky 168,681 89,008 18.6% $204,990 746
Utah 154,955 87,207 15.4% $341,559 509
Oklahoma 147,049 72,214 16.2% $211,635 720
Oregon 143,348 77,999 15.2% $328,738 611
Louisiana 139,388 62,347 21.0% $208,314 589
Nevada 132,252 65,892 16.6% $342,780 529
Arkansas 123,228 59,041 17.4% $201,501 677
Connecticut 121,672 66,840 17.8% $308,264 600
Iowa 110,208 67,724 12.1% $181,161 667
Mississippi 106,631 49,565 21.8% $172,586 574
Kansas 94,530 53,667 14.3% $220,449 645
Idaho 85,094 47,835 14.7% $307,474 494
New Mexico 73,836 36,442 18.2% $232,263 485
Nebraska 67,379 38,344 12.3% $220,678 472
Maine 54,849 31,775 16.1% $255,119 459
West Virginia 54,365 27,168 20.7% $180,868 470
New Hampshire 53,683 30,185 17.5% $298,297 447
Delaware 48,776 24,280 17.6% $274,655 479
Rhode Island 41,962 22,697 19.4% $293,185 390
Montana 35,587 19,431 15.0% $333,180 447
Hawaii 32,059 16,087 22.4% $568,960 261
South Dakota 26,718 15,894 12.6% $250,754 310
Puerto Rico 22,790 12,640 14.8% $177,573 63
Wyoming 21,223 11,293 14.8% $279,365 341
North Dakota 20,726 13,102 10.8% $237,293 266
Alaska 19,669 10,603 14.1% $312,464 207
Vermont 19,531 11,750 15.2% $260,051 243
District of Columbia 16,961 8,399 17.4% $648,816 387
Guam 157 112 7.6% $406,592 4
U.S. Virgin Islands 68 36 11.8% $347,647 5

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do mortgage denial rates vary by state?

State-level denial rates reflect differences in median home prices relative to incomes, the mix of loan types (conventional vs. FHA vs. VA), the density of lenders in the market, foreclosure laws, and local economic conditions. States with high home prices and stagnant wages tend to produce more applications from buyers stretching to qualify, which can raise denial rates.

What does the lender count column show?

The lender count shows how many HMDA-reporting institutions had at least one loan application in that state during 2024. It does not represent lenders headquartered in the state, a national bank operating in 50 states would appear in every state's count.

Why are some US territories included in the state data?

HMDA reporting covers all US states plus territories where lenders with HMDA reporting obligations operate, including Puerto Rico, Guam, the US Virgin Islands, and others. The CFPB compiles territory data using the same methodology as states, making it comparable in structure even if volumes are smaller.

Why state-level views matter when shopping a mortgage

State-level HMDA aggregates are the single most useful map of mortgage market structure in the United States. Each state is, in practice, its own mortgage market: state-licensed lenders, state-specific consumer protection rules, state-recorded title and foreclosure procedures, and state-level pricing trends shaped by housing supply, in-migration, and the local economy. A national lender that ranks highly in California may have minor presence in West Virginia; a regional credit union dominating Texas may not lend a single dollar in Maine. Looking at the country one state at a time is the only honest way to compare lender availability for a real borrower whose address sits in exactly one state.

The application-volume column on this table is a proxy for market activity, not a quality grade. High-volume states (California, Texas, Florida) generate more applications because they have more people, more transactions, and higher median home values, meaning more borrowers crossing the conforming-loan threshold and triggering HMDA reportability. Low-volume jurisdictions reflect smaller populations or smaller housing stocks, not weaker lending markets. Within each state, the lender count column shows how many distinct HMDA reporters had at least one application that year, which is a rough but useful read on lender competition. States with more lenders typically see slightly tighter pricing as institutions compete for the same conforming-conventional loans.

Denial rates, average loan size, and what they jointly imply

Denial rates and average loan amounts move together in informative ways. A state with high median loan amounts and moderate denial rates suggests a market where lenders are comfortable underwriting larger loans, often an affluent, low-foreclosure-risk environment. A state with high average loan amounts and high denial rates suggests an affordability stretch, borrowers are applying for larger loans relative to local incomes than the underwriting box accepts. A state with low average loan amounts and high denial rates often signals a credit-stressed market with manufactured-housing or small-purchase activity producing thin underwriting margins.

Drilling into any specific state's page surfaces the lender breakdown within that state. The lender column shows who is actually originating loans in that geography, frequently a mix of national banks, regional banks, credit unions, and independent mortgage banks (IMBs). IMBs have become the largest single category of mortgage originator by volume nationally, but their state-by-state footprint varies dramatically because they target specific underwriting niches. PlainLender's per-state breakdowns make those distinctions visible.

Two practical disclaimers apply at the state level. First, HMDA data lags by a year, so a state-level snapshot describes the prior calendar year's activity, not current conditions. Second, state aggregates can mask intra-state variation: metro Atlanta and rural Georgia look like very different mortgage markets when split into county-level data, even though they share a state row in this table. Click through to county and metro pages when local detail matters for your search.

Data source: CFPB HMDA 2024 Snapshot National Loan-Level Dataset. Sorted by application volume descending. State geography per U.S. Census Bureau FIPS standards. This data is provided for informational purposes only.